
Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) has wrapped up FY 2025 with fourth quarter revenue of about US$33.4 million and a basic EPS loss of US$1.41, alongside a net income loss of US$80.8 million. The company has seen trailing twelve month revenue move from US$227.0 million in Q4 2024 to US$170.2 million in Q4 2025. Over the same period, trailing EPS has shifted from a loss of US$10.54 to a loss of US$5.64, indicating that the business is still absorbing heavy costs even as losses on a per share basis have narrowed. With margins still firmly in negative territory, the latest results keep attention on how quickly the company can tighten its cost base and convert its platform into more efficient revenue.
See our full analysis for Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings.With the numbers on the table, the next step is to see how this earnings run rate lines up with the prevailing narratives about growth potential, risk, and execution around Ginkgo Bioworks.
See what the community is saying about Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings
Bulls who see cost cuts and automation as a springboard for a future margin lift can test that view in more detail in the 🐂 Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings Bull Case
If you want to see how skeptics connect this revenue profile to their concerns about the business model, take a closer look at the 🐻 Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings Bear Case
To see how these results tie into long-term growth, risks, and valuation, check out the full range of community narratives for Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings on Simply Wall St. Add the company to your watchlist or portfolio so you'll be alerted when the story evolves.
With sentiment clearly divided between risk and reward, this is the moment to look through the numbers yourself and decide where you stand, starting with the 1 key reward and 2 important warning signs
Ginkgo Bioworks is still carrying sizeable losses, facing pressure on revenue and trading at a premium P/S multiple despite expectations for continued unprofitability.
If you are uneasy about that mix of earnings risk and valuation, shift your focus to companies screened for resilience using the 72 resilient stocks with low risk scores.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com