Consistent with its fiduciary duties, the Special Committee carefully reviewed the Proposal in consultation with its independent advisors and unanimously determined that it is not in the best interests of Seer’s stockholders because it undervalues Seer and fails to reflect the value of Seer’s long-term growth prospects. In reaching this conclusion, the Special Committee noted that the contingent value rights included in the Proposal, which are intended to allow Seer’s stockholders to benefit from future developments related to Seer’s technology, were insufficient to fully value Seer and its growth potential.

Disclaimer:This article represents the opinion of the author only. It does not represent the opinion of Webull, nor should it be viewed as an indication that Webull either agrees with or confirms the truthfulness or accuracy of the information. It should not be considered as investment advice from Webull or anyone else, nor should it be used as the basis of any investment decision.