-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%
Thomson Reuters (TSX:TRI) Stock Looks Cheap On Cash Flow While Earnings Look Pricey
Share
Listen to the news

Thomson Reuters stock has fallen 38.9% over the past year, yet both the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) intrinsic value estimate and market multiples still point to the shares screening as undervalued. That mix of weak recent returns and supportive valuation signals is now front of mind for investors looking at the stock.

  • The 38.9% share price decline over the last 12 months raises the question of whether recent pessimism has pushed Thomson Reuters below what its underlying cash flows may justify.
  • The launch of the proprietary large language model "Thomson" and the next generation of CoCounsel Legal can support expectations for future revenue and cash flow, while execution risk around scaling these AI offerings may weigh on how much value the market assigns to them.
  • On Simply Wall St's broader checks, Thomson Reuters is assessed as undervalued on 4 of 6 measures, a mixed picture rather than a clear bargain or clear overvaluation 4/6.

The issue now is whether that combination of discounted valuation signals and new AI products is enough to suggest the current Thomson Reuters share price still understates its intrinsic value.

Find out why Thomson Reuters' -38.9% return over the last year is lagging behind its peers.

Is Thomson Reuters a Bargain on Cash Flow?

The Discounted Cash Flow model for Thomson Reuters projects future cash flows and then works back to an estimated value today. On this approach, the latest twelve month free cash flow sits at about $2.2b, with the model assuming growing cash flows over time rather than a sharp step change or decline. That steady profile feeds into a 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity framework that looks past short term swings and focuses on what the business can generate for shareholders over many years.

On those assumptions, the model points to an estimated intrinsic value of about CA$284 per share. That compares with the current market price and implies the stock screens as roughly 49.3% undervalued. The launch of Thomson Reuters’ proprietary large language model Thomson, and the next generation of CoCounsel Legal, may help explain why the cash flow outlook used in the model embeds ongoing growth in the underlying business.

On balance, the DCF work suggests Thomson Reuters stock currently looks undervalued relative to the cash flows it is projected to generate.

Our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggests Thomson Reuters is undervalued by 49.3%. Track this in your watchlist or portfolio, or discover 14 more high quality undervalued stocks.

TRI Discounted Cash Flow as at Aug 2026
TRI Discounted Cash Flow as at Aug 2026

Head to the Valuation section of our Company Report for more details on how we arrive at this Fair Value for Thomson Reuters.

Is Thomson Reuters Still Cheap on Earnings?

The P/E ratio is often a useful way to think about what you are paying today for each dollar of Thomson Reuters earnings. Right now the stock trades on a P/E of about 26.9x, which is above the Professional Services industry average of roughly 16.6x and also above the peer group average of about 24.7x.

Simply Wall St’s fair P/E estimate for Thomson Reuters is higher again at about 40.3x. That suggests the current multiple sits at a discount to what might be expected after factoring in the company’s size, margins, industry position and risk profile, even if the absolute P/E level looks full against the broader sector.

On this P/E yardstick, Thomson Reuters stock screens as undervalued relative to the fair multiple implied by the fundamentals used in the model.

TSX:TRI P/E Ratio as at Aug 2026
TSX:TRI P/E Ratio as at Aug 2026

See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown.

The Thomson Reuters Narrative: What Would Justify Today's Price?

Simply Wall St Narratives for Thomson Reuters sit on the Community page and act as the link between the valuation puzzle above and the specific future paths that could make Thomson Reuters' stock worth materially more or less than it is today. They spell out which growth, margin and earnings assumptions would need to hold, and turn a single model output into a set of underlying expectations you can watch over time to see whether they remain realistic.

One of the top community narratives on Thomson Reuters: 29% undervalued

"The company’s evolution from traditional publishing to AI powered intelligence platforms reflects a broader shift, professional services no longer compete on knowledge alone, but on how effectively that knowledge is surfaced, contextualized, and applied…"

Read one of the top narratives on Thomson Reuters

Do you think there's more to the story for Thomson Reuters? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying!

The Bottom Line

The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) work and the market multiple view both point to Thomson Reuters screening as undervalued, even though the broader valuation checks are only mixed rather than overwhelmingly strong. That creates a clear question for you as an investor: Is the current discount a cushion against execution risk on the new AI products, or is the market correctly cautious about how much revenue and cash flow those tools will realistically support? The crux from here is whether Thomson Reuters can turn its AI initiatives into durable earnings and cash generation without eroding returns, and whether the market is willing to re-rate the stock if that happens.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Disclaimer:This article represents the opinion of the author only. It does not represent the opinion of Webull, nor should it be viewed as an indication that Webull either agrees with or confirms the truthfulness or accuracy of the information. It should not be considered as investment advice from Webull or anyone else, nor should it be used as the basis of any investment decision.
What's Trending