-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%
Here's How Many Shares of Procter & Gamble You'd Need for $15,000 in Yearly Dividends
Share
Listen to the news

Key Points

  • It would take 3,456 shares of Procter & Gamble to collect $15,000 in annual dividends.

  • This business has paid a dividend for a mind-boggling 136 straight years.

If it's strong capital appreciation that you're after, then Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG) isn't the best investment candidate. Its shares are up just 67% in the past decade (as of Sept. 3), drastically underperforming the S&P 500 index.

But if you're seeking a blue chip dividend stock, then Procter & Gamble is hard to beat. Its dividend yield of nearly 3% is almost triple the benchmark average.

Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a "Double Down" signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same "Total Conviction" signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »

Here's how many shares of this company you'd need for $15,000 in yearly dividends.

Procter & Gamble logo on blue filter with factory in background.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Procter & Gamble currently pays an annual dividend of about $4.34 per share. This means you would have to own 3,456 shares to generate $15,000 in yearly passive income. Based on the stock price of $147.51, investors would be required to pay $510,000 to buy enough shares.

The company's commitment to its shareholders is incredible. Procter & Gamble has increased its dividend payout for 70 straight years. Any business that has at least 50 years of raises is considered a Dividend King. What's more, the company has paid a dividend for 136 straight years.

Investors seeking a steady and predictable income stream have come to the right place. Procter & Gamble's strong competitive position, sizable profits, and history of successfully navigating any adverse developments make it a safe holding.

Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer:This article represents the opinion of the author only. It does not represent the opinion of Webull, nor should it be viewed as an indication that Webull either agrees with or confirms the truthfulness or accuracy of the information. It should not be considered as investment advice from Webull or anyone else, nor should it be used as the basis of any investment decision.
What's Trending