-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%
The Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council held a regular press conference. A reporter asked. Recently, Lin Jialong, head of Taiwan's foreign affairs department, wrote to the Japanese media that “the rules-based international order is facing challenges from authoritarian countries” and that “China is deliberately misinterpreting UN General Assembly resolution 2758 in an attempt to prevent Taiwan from participating in international organizations. If the international community does not stop it, the relevant arguments may be used by China to create a legal basis for future military aggression against Taiwan.” Any comments on this please? Spokesman Zhang Han said in response to questions that the remarks merely distorted the facts and turned black and white upside down. The United Nations Charter laid the foundation for the post-war international order and established an international system with the United Nations at its core. Adherence to the UN Charter became the greatest common denominator of the post-war international community. She pointed out that there is only one China in the world, and Taiwan is an inalienable part of China's territory. General Assembly resolution 2758 clearly states at the outset that restoring the legal rights of the People's Republic of China is essential to uphold the United Nations Charter and the cause that the United Nations Organization must carry out in accordance with the Charter, and solemnly clarifies the clear position of safeguarding the authority of the United Nations. The resolution completely resolved the issue of the representation of all China in the United Nations, including Taiwan, from a political, legal, and procedural standpoint. Zhang Han stressed that the historical context is clear, and the legal facts are clear and clear. The DPP administration has repeatedly misrepresented and attacked General Assembly resolution 2758 in an attempt to challenge the authority of the United Nations and the post-war international order, which is absolutely impossible.
Share
Listen to the news
The Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council held a regular press conference. A reporter asked. Recently, Lin Jialong, head of Taiwan's foreign affairs department, wrote to the Japanese media that “the rules-based international order is facing challenges from authoritarian countries” and that “China is deliberately misinterpreting UN General Assembly resolution 2758 in an attempt to prevent Taiwan from participating in international organizations. If the international community does not stop it, the relevant arguments may be used by China to create a legal basis for future military aggression against Taiwan.” Any comments on this please? Spokesman Zhang Han said in response to questions that the remarks merely distorted the facts and turned black and white upside down. The United Nations Charter laid the foundation for the post-war international order and established an international system with the United Nations at its core. Adherence to the UN Charter became the greatest common denominator of the post-war international community. She pointed out that there is only one China in the world, and Taiwan is an inalienable part of China's territory. General Assembly resolution 2758 clearly states at the outset that restoring the legal rights of the People's Republic of China is essential to uphold the United Nations Charter and the cause that the United Nations Organization must carry out in accordance with the Charter, and solemnly clarifies the clear position of safeguarding the authority of the United Nations. The resolution completely resolved the issue of the representation of all China in the United Nations, including Taiwan, from a political, legal, and procedural standpoint. Zhang Han stressed that the historical context is clear, and the legal facts are clear and clear. The DPP administration has repeatedly misrepresented and attacked General Assembly resolution 2758 in an attempt to challenge the authority of the United Nations and the post-war international order, which is absolutely impossible.
Disclaimer:Webull uses external vendor Google Translation Service for news translations where we endeavour to ensure these are correct, however, we recommend that you please double-check this information accordingly. Webull is not responsible for translation errors or issues.
What's Trending