-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%
-+ 0.00%
The National Artificial Intelligence Standardization General Group released the “Research Report on the Ethical Governance of Embodied Intelligence” today. The report focuses on embodying intelligent ethical governance, summarizing systems, and proposing governance plans in terms of full life cycle governance, technology protection, and standard leadership. According to our understanding, embodied intelligence ethics is a branch of artificial intelligence ethics. The report sorted out six types of ethical risks, including damage to human autonomy, social relationships and development rights, personal injury and public safety, privacy infringement and misuse of personal information, prejudice discrimination and service exclusion, misidentification and overestimation of ability, unclear responsibility and difficulty in recovering incidents. According to the severity of the damage, the five risk levels from R1 to R5 were classified, and six basic governance guidelines were proposed around risk categories that are people-centered, safe and controllable, privacy protection, fair and inclusive, transparent, explainable, and traceable responsibilities.
Share
Listen to the news
The National Artificial Intelligence Standardization General Group released the “Research Report on the Ethical Governance of Embodied Intelligence” today. The report focuses on personalized intelligent ethical governance, summarizes systems, and proposes governance plans in terms of full life cycle governance, technology protection, and standard leadership. According to our understanding, embodied intelligence ethics is a branch of artificial intelligence ethics. The report sorted out six types of ethical risks, including damage to human autonomy, social relationships and development rights, personal injury and public safety, privacy infringement and misuse of personal information, prejudice discrimination and service exclusion, misidentification and overestimation of ability, unclear responsibility and difficulty in recovering incidents. According to the severity of the damage, the five risk levels of R1 to R5 were classified, and six basic governance guidelines were proposed around risk categories that are people-centered, safe and controllable, privacy protection, fair and inclusive, transparent, explainable, and traceable responsibilities.
Disclaimer:Webull uses external vendor Google Translation Service for news translations where we endeavour to ensure these are correct, however, we recommend that you please double-check this information accordingly. Webull is not responsible for translation errors or issues.
What's Trending