
If you had bought Allfunds Group on 16 October 2025, the decision would have rested on clashing views about fee pressure, digital disintermediation and the payoff from Asia and alternatives. For Allfunds Group shareholders, the return over the past year was 63.1%, including dividends. The blockchain partnership announcement and stronger recent net margin now sit on the table as fresh facts. Were early buyers correctly weighing structural growth against margin risk, or were they simply compensated for being early to a big experiment?
Allfunds Group has already moved. Pinpoint other ways to investigate the theme among 18 cryptocurrency and blockchain stocks.
The shares cost €6.25 at the start of the period, and Allfunds Group sat between two very different stories about where fund distribution might go next.
The bullish narrative pointed to a Fair Value of €12.86, a price implied by expectations of strong alternatives and Asia momentum, and margin uplift from automation and outsourcing into its platform. Supporters focused on assumptions that revenue could grow 11.0% a year and that margins might swing from a loss position to 34.2% by 2028.
The cautious view anchored on a Fair Value of €5.8, reflecting concerns about fee compression and slow subscription traction. This camp highlighted risks from cheaper passive products, lower revenue margins on new flows, and disintermediation as large distributors invested in their own digital pipes.
The Allfunds Group blockchain API tie up with Alchelyst backed the optimistic case that digital infrastructure could deepen private markets distribution. At the same time, H1 2026 figures showed revenue of €352.7m and net income of €81.9m, with net margin at 23.2% versus 13.1% a year earlier. The evidence cut both ways but leaned toward the bullish profitability argument.
The episode turned on whether efficiency gains would show up in the income statement. For a different business, you would watch net margin alongside any big tech or automation pitch and check whether profitability actually tracks the story over multiple reports.
Allfunds Group now trades at €9.8, and the selected Narrative judges its Fair Value to be below that level. The gap reflects concern that fee pressure and deal execution risk may not fully align with what the recent 63.1% move over the past year seems to assume.
A buyer today effectively has to believe that alternatives, tokenized funds and the Deutsche Börse tie up all translate into resilient, higher quality earnings. The question is how the Narrative's worries about revenue mix, pricing and integration might test that assumption.
"The main thing that has to go right is that Allfunds Group converts its growing alternatives and tokenized fund ecosystem into durable, higher quality revenue that more than offsets fee pressure on its core platform. The current valuation implies the Allfunds Group share price already reflects a long runway of high margin growth and successful execution on private markets, blockchain automation and the portfolio refocus."
The price and this Narrative do not agree. → Uncover what this Narrative says Allfunds Group is actually worth
Allfunds shows what happens when financial plumbing moves further into software. The next question is where those digital payments start.
Every subscription, fund switch and advisory fee begins with a simple transfer. Before assets shift, someone still has to move cash cleanly and quickly.
Another large platform focuses on that payment layer, not fund selection. It connects people and merchants so money travels across cards, balances and crypto.
Rather than holding full bank charters, it uses partners for balance sheets. That keeps it focused on software, speed and monetising a broad user base.
If Allfunds reflects how investment pipes change, this other player shows how the money enters those pipes in the first place.
One Narrative has already put a figure on it. → Uncover the company trading 31% below one Narrative's Fair Value
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com