DATE

Friday, Oct. 23, 2026

CALL PARTICIPANTS

• Vice President of Investor Relations and treasurer - Michael Dillon
• Chief Executive Officer - Timothy K. Flanagan
• Chief Financial Officer - Rory F. O'Donnell Jr.

TAKEAWAYS

• Net Sales -- $140 million, representing a 3% decline from $144 million in the third quarter of 2025 driven by lower weighted average realized pricing.
• Net Loss -- $47 million, or $1.76 per share, compared to a net loss of $28 million, or $1.10 per share, in the prior year period.
• Adjusted EBITDA -- $9 million, a decrease from $13 million in the third quarter of 2025 due to lower weighted average realized pricing partially offset by lower cash costs.
• Sales Volume -- 28.8 thousand metric tons, which was flat versus the third quarter of 2025 and kept the company on track for 5% to 10% annual growth.
• Weighted Average Realized Price -- $3,900 per metric ton, a 7% decrease from the prior year quarter but flat compared to the second quarter of 2026.
• Cash Cost of Goods Sold -- $3,653 per metric ton, representing a 4% decline compared to the third quarter of 2025 driven by manufacturing productivity and cost reduction initiatives.
• Production Volume -- 27 thousand metric tons, an increase of 2% compared to the prior year quarter but a 19% sequential decline from the second quarter of 2026 due to maintenance shutdowns.
• Capacity Utilization Rate -- 64%, compared to 63% in the prior year quarter and 74% in the second quarter of 2026.
• Total Liquidity -- $242 million, consisting of $134 million in cash and $108 million in available capacity under a revolving credit facility as of Sept. 30, 2026.
• Gross Debt -- $1.2 billion, providing a stable capital structure with substantially no debt maturities until December 2029.
• Monterrey Closure Savings -- $20 million to $25 million in annual cash cost savings, with the full benefit expected to be realized by 2028.
• Future Capacity -- 127,000 metric tons, the expected annual graphite electrode production capacity following the completion of the Monterrey facility transition in the second quarter of 2027.
• Monterrey Closure Charges -- $14 million, representing restructuring and other exit charges associated with the facility wind-down, the majority of which were non-cash.
• Inventory Level Increase -- $11.1 million, reflecting a seasonal increase consistent with management expectations for the quarter.
• Capital Expenditures -- $7.8 million for the quarter, with the full-year 2026 expectation maintained at approximately $35 million.
• Needle Coke Market Price -- $1,700 to $2,000 per metric ton, which has increased from a range of $1,000 to $1,200 per metric ton at the start of the year.
• Chinese Export Decline -- 10%, representing the year-over-year decrease in Chinese graphite electrode exports through the first nine months of 2026.
• Steel Production Growth -- 2%, the year-over-year increase in global steel production excluding China through the first two months of the third quarter.
• Realized Pricing Guidance -- mid-single-digit percentage increase, expected for the fourth quarter of 2026 compared to the third quarter as higher-priced commitments begin to flow through results.
• Working Capital Release -- $20 million to $25 million, expected as a one-time release in 2028 following the completion of the manufacturing footprint optimization.
• March Price Increase Realization -- 15%, representing the estimated uplift from customer commitments made following the March price increase.
• Historical Price Spread -- $4,000 per metric ton, the historical inflation-adjusted average spread between petroleum needle coke and graphite electrode prices over the past 20 years.

Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst? Email pr@fool.com

RISKS

• Rory F. O'Donnell Jr. warned that management anticipates "higher energy costs as portions of that contractual coverage reset" when looking ahead to 2026 and 2027.
• Timothy K. Flanagan stated, "we were disappointed with the preliminary outcome as it related to India," regarding the U.S. Department of Commerce anti-dumping investigation into large diameter graphite electrodes.

SUMMARY

GrafTech International Ltd. (NYSE:EAF) reported a third quarter characterized by building pricing momentum and the implementation of a significant manufacturing footprint consolidation. Management stated that realized pricing has reached an inflection point, with new customer commitments being secured at higher levels than those established early in 2026. The company announced the planned closure of its manufacturing facility in Monterrey, Mexico, to optimize costs and better align production capacity with market demand. The company reported that this action will reduce fixed costs and future capital requirements while concentrating production at larger, more efficient facilities in Europe. Management also highlighted strategic progress in developing synthetic graphite applications for adjacent markets, including the energy storage sector.

• Management indicated that the Monterrey facility was selected for closure because it was the highest cost and smallest manufacturing asset in the company's portfolio.
• Rory F. O'Donnell Jr. noted that "each $100 improvement in our weighted average realized price would equate to approximately $12 million of incremental annual cash flow."
• The company announced a collaboration with Antora Energy to leverage manufacturing capabilities at its St. Marys, Pennsylvania, facility for thermal battery technology.
• Timothy K. Flanagan stated that the company expects its 2027 order book to be approximately 60% to 65% confirmed by early next year, which is consistent with historical contracting timelines.
• Management reported that global steel industry fundamentals outside of China are gradually improving, with world steel demand expected to accelerate from 1.5% growth in 2026 to 4% in 2027.

INDUSTRY GLOSSARY

• Graphite Electrodes: Industrial components used in electric arc furnaces to melt scrap steel and other metals.
• Electric Arc Furnace (EAF): A method of steelmaking that uses electricity to melt scrap steel, generally considered less carbon-intensive than traditional blast furnaces.
• Petroleum Needle Coke: A high-value carbon material derived from decant oil that serves as the primary raw material for manufacturing graphite electrodes.
• Decant Oil: A heavy refinery byproduct used as the feedstock to produce petroleum needle coke.
• Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM): A European Union policy that imposes a carbon price on certain imported goods to ensure regional steel producers remain competitive while meeting environmental standards.
• Connecting Pins: Specialized components used to join graphite electrodes into a continuous string during the steelmaking process.

Full Conference Call Transcript

Operator: Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us and welcome to GrafTech's Third Quarter 26 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. After today's prepared remarks, we will host a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press 1. To raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press 1. Again. I will now hand the conference over to Mike Dillon, Vice President of Investor Relations and treasurer. Please go ahead.

Michael Dillon: Good morning, and welcome to GrafTech International's Third Quarter 26 Earnings Call. Thank you for joining us. Joining me on the call are Timothy K. Flanagan, Chief Executive Officer Roy O'Donnell, Chief Financial Officer; Timothy will begin with opening comments on our key strategic initiatives, Rory will then provide a color on our quarterly results, outlook and other financial matters. After closing comments by Timothy, we will then open the call to questions. Turning to our next slide, as a reminder, our comments today may include forward-looking statements regarding among other things, performance, trends and strategies. These statements are based on current expectations and are subject to risks and uncertainties.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements are shown here. We will also discuss certain non GAAP financial measures, these slides include the relevant non GAAP reconciliations. You can find these slides in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.graftech.com replay of the call will also be available on our website. I will now turn the call over to Timothy.

Timothy K. Flanagan: Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. The third quarter marked another important period for GrafTech as we continued to advance the commercial, operational, and strategic initiatives designed to improve our long term profitability and strengthen our competitive position. We are particularly encouraged by the progress we are making on the pricing front. As higher price customer commitments reinforce our confidence, that we have reached an inflection point in our realized pricing. During the quarter, we also announced a significant step in our strategy to improve the efficiency and competitiveness of our manufacturing footprint. Through the planned closure of our Monterrey, Mexico, facility.

These actions, together with our ongoing efforts to improve our cost structure, advocate for fair trade, capitalize on emerging market opportunities, reflect our commitment to taking decisive steps to strengthen GrafTech's financial performance. We also remain confident in the longer term fundamentals of our end markets. Supported by improving steel industry conditions across many of our key regions, the continued transition towards electric arc furnace steelmaking, and the growing strategic importance of synthetic graphite. This morning, I would like to begin with an update on our strategic priorities, followed by our perspectives on the steel market and broader industry environment. I will then discuss safety before turning the call over to Rory for a review of our financial results.

On the commercial front, our disciplined commercial approach is beginning to produce tangible results. During the third quarter and early in the fourth quarter, we continued to secure customer commitments at higher-priced levels than those secured earlier in this period this year. Reinforcing our expectation for meaningful improvement in realized pricing in 2027. Restoring graphite electrode pricing to more sustainable levels remains essential to supporting continued investment in high quality manufacturing capacity, ensuring reliable supply for our customers. As we have seen in prior industry cycles, changes in the balance between supply and demand can result in relatively rapid and significant movements in graphite electrode pricing.

While the timing and magnitude of any recovery will depend on market conditions, we believe the combination of improving commercial momentum, and actions to better address industry overcapacity create the potential for meaningful price recovery. To put our recent pricing progress in perspective, market pricing continued to decline early in 2026 before beginning to recover during the second quarter. On the heels of the price increase we announced in March. Since then, we have seen sustained improvement in prices reflected in new customer commitments. However, because of our realized pricing, reported to date in 2026 reflects commitments that were primarily entered into in prior periods, those improvements have not yet translated into our quarterly results.

Our weighted average realized pricing was approximately $3.9 thousand per metric ton in the third quarter. Essentially flat with the second quarter. However, based on our current order book, and the timing of shipments against these higher priced commitments, we expect a mid single digit percentage increase in realized pricing in the fourth quarter. Looking ahead to 2027, we are seeing positive results in securing customer commitments at significantly higher prices than those reflected in our 2026 business. While a substantial portion of our anticipated 2027 volume remains to be committed, is typical for this point in the year, these initial results reinforce our confidence in the pricing momentum we are building.

Importantly, our objective is not simply to achieve near term improvement in pricing, but to establish a more sustainable pricing environment. We believe our efforts to better align production capacity with underlying demand together with the value customers place on reliable, high quality supply, provide important support for that objective. We remain focused on securing commitments that appropriately reflect the value of our differentiated products technical capabilities, and reliable supply. Maintaining discipline in how we allocate our available production capacity. We look forward to providing a more comprehensive update on our 2027 commercial position when we report our fourth quarter results early next year. Beyond our own commercial progress, we are also seeing positive industry developments.

In China, graphite electrode prices have increased throughout the year. Supported in part by higher raw material costs. At the same time, Chinese graphite electrode exports have declined approximately 10% year over year. Taken together, we view these developments as further indications that the prolonged period of low industry pricing is beginning to change. We are also seeing strengthening conditions in the petroleum needle coke market. Needle coke prices have steadily increased throughout the year, reflecting a combination of high raw material costs evolving supply and demand conditions. At the same time, interest in our own needle coke production capabilities is growing amongst potential customers serving various end markets.

Historically needle coke and graphite electrode pricing have been closely correlated with an average spread between the 2 of approximately $4 thousand per metric ton. Over the past 20 years on an inflation adjusted basis. Therefore, we believe the strengthening needle coke market provides another catalyst for higher electrode pricing while vertical integration positions GrafTech favorably as these market dynamics evolve. Second, with respect to our manufacturing footprint, In the third quarter, we announced the planned closure of our graphite electrode manufacturing facility in Monterrey, Mexico. This represents an important step in our efforts to optimize our manufacturing network, improve operational efficiency, and better align production capacity with market demand.

Over the past several years, the graphite electrode industry has faced persistent structural overcapacity, reflecting significant capacity additions in certain markets that have outpaced underlying demand growth. These conditions have contributed to a prolonged period of depressed pricing, and have made it increasingly difficult to justify maintaining excess manufacturing capacity. We have taken meaningful actions over the past several years to improve our cost structure and operational efficiency. However, given the continued imbalance between industry supply and demand, we determined that further action was necessary. Following the phased wind-down of Monterrey, customer requirements currently served by that facility will transition to our manufacturing operations in Calais, France and Pamplona, Spain.

The transition of connecting pin production capacity to Pamplona is also in process and on track. Transition to our manufacturing operations in Calais, France and Pamplona, Spain. The transition of connecting pin production capacity to Pamplona is also in process and on track. Upon the completion of this transition early in the second quarter of 27, our annual graphite electrode production capacity is expected to be 127 thousand metric tons. Importantly, we are confident this consolidation will enable us to serve our customers more efficiently through a more competitive manufacturing footprint. While preserving the differentiated product capabilities and technical expertise that are central to GrafTech's value proposition.

We expect the initiative to strengthen our cost structure, improve operating efficiency, and reduce future capital requirements. We are managing the transition carefully with a focus on safety, maintaining supply continuity, and meeting our customer commitments. I also want to reiterate our support for the employees impacted by this decision. The Monterey team has made important contributions to GrafTech over many years, and we are committed to treating our colleagues with respect, supporting them throughout the transition. Taken together, our ongoing manufacturing productivity, and cost reduction initiatives, this action represents another meaningful step towards establishing a more sustainable foundation for long term profitability.

Following the wind down of operations, a permanent removal of graphite electrode production capabilities at Monterey, we intend to pursue the sale of the property and have already begun preliminary activities in preparation for a potential transaction. Any proceeds from a future sale would provide additional opportunity to support our liquidity position and reduce our outstanding debt, consistent with the requirements of our loan to us. Third, with respect to trade policy. We continue to advocate for fair trade and more balanced competitive commit conditions across the graphite electrode industry, including through our supportive of trade proceedings in key commercial jurisdictions. As we discussed last quarter, the U. S.

Department of Commerce has been investigating imports of large diameter graphite electrodes from China and India. Since our last call, Commerce has issued its preliminary anti-dumping determination While we were disappointed with the preliminary outcome as it related to India, it is important to emphasize that the investigation is not yet complete. Information submitted by the Indian respondents remains subject to verification by commerce and the final determination is expected during the first quarter of 27. We will remain actively engaged throughout the remainder of this process and continue to support efforts to address unfair trade practices that undermine the competitiveness of domestic graphite electrode manufacturing.

More broadly, we believe appropriate trade enforcement is an important component of establishing a healthier and more sustainable competitive environment. Particularly as governments increasingly recognize the strategic importance of maintaining domestic and regional industrial capabilities. Finally, with respect to emerging opportunities. We continue to believe that the growing strategic importance of synthetic graphite presents attractive, longer term, opportunities for GrafTech. As we have discussed previously, graphite electrodes are essential to electric arc furnace steelmaking, which we expect to benefit from the continued transition towards more sustainable methods steel production. At the same time, demand for high quality synthetic graphite petroleum needle coke is expanding into applications beyond traditional steel making. Including battery materials, energy storage, certain defense and industrial applications.

These trends are reinforcing the importance of reliable, high quality supply chains particularly in North America and Europe. GrafTech's vertical integration into petroleum needle coke extensive manufacturing capabilities, and expertise in graphite and carbon science provide a differentiated foundation from which to pursue these opportunities. An example of our progress in this area, which we are quite excited about, is a collaboration with Antora Energy that we announced in September. Antora develops thermal batteries designed to provide reliable energy supply for industrial applications such as AI data centers. And our collaboration is focused on leveraging our manufacturing capabilities at our St. Marys, Pennsylvania, facility to support this technology.

Although still in its early stages, this represents tangible progress in our efforts to leverage existing assets and technical capabilities to develop new revenue opportunities. We continue to engage with prospective customers and strategic partners and policymakers to evaluate opportunities that leverage our existing capabilities and infrastructure. These opportunities remain at various stages of development, and we believe they offer an attractive potential to diversify our business over time and create additional value from our assets. In summary, we are making progress on several important fronts. Pricing momentum is building, and we are taking decisive steps to improve our manufacturing footprint and cost structure. And we continue to position GrafTech to benefit from longer term growth opportunities.

We believe these actions will strengthen our competitive position enhance our ability to generate improved earnings and cash flow as industry conditions recover. With that, let me turn to the broader steel market environment. Turning to slide 5. Let me spend a few minutes discussing the broader steel market, as steel industry fundamentals remain the primary driver of long term graphite electric demand. Overall, we continue to see improving trends across several of our key regions, supporting our expectation for modest growth in graphite electrode demand during 2026. Through the first 2 months of the third quarter, global steel production, excluding China, totaled approximately 142 million metric tons, an increase of approximately 2% compared to the corresponding period last year.

In The United States, steel production continues to benefit from favorable trade policies and resilient domestic demand, with steel capacity utilization reaching 80% for the second consecutive quarter. While the pace of improvement varies by region, we are also encouraged by recent policy developments in Europe that we believe will support a more favorable environment for regional steel producers over time. Taken together, these trends reinforce our view that steel industry fundamentals outside of China are gradually improving providing constructive foundation for graphite electrode demand. Turning to slide 6. Beyond the improving conditions we are seeing today, several potential catalysts could support additional growth in steel demand over the coming years.

These include infrastructure investment, higher defense spending, investments associated with the energy transition, and growing demand related to artificial intelligence and data center infrastructure. We also see opportunities for additional demand growth as construction activity recovers, investment in steel intensive manufacturing increases, and geopolitical tensions ease. While the timing and magnitude of these individual catalysts will vary, we believe their combined impact provides a favorable backdrop for steel demand growth over the medium term. Importantly, this perspective is supported by the World Steel latest short range outlook published earlier this month. The World Steel Association is projecting finished steel demand growth outside of China of approximately 1.5% in 2020 accelerating to 4% in 2027.

We view this anticipated acceleration as encouraging indicator of improving industry fundamentals with positive implications for graphite electrode demand. Specifically in Europe, which remains 1 of our most important commercial regions, we see important developments aimed at strengthening the competitiveness regional steel production. As we discussed last quarter, the implementation of the European Union's carbon border adjustment mechanism together with increased trade protections for steel, has potential to improve the competitive position of European steelmakers. More broadly, we believe these catalysts will drive increased regional steel production over time and support our view that graphite electrode demand outside of China will increase at a compound annual growth rate of approximately 3% in the coming years.

While the pace of improvement will depend on broader economic and market conditions, we believe that these demand drivers, combined with other strategic actions, we are taking to improve our commercial performance, and cost structure, position GrafTech to benefit as the industry conditions strengthen. Before turning the call over to worry, I would like to briefly discuss an area that will always remain our highest priority which is safety. I have always believed that no business objective is ever more important than ensuring our people return home safely at the end of every shift. And I am proud of the continued focus our employees have demonstrated across our global operations.

Through the first 9 months of 2026, our total recordable incident rate was point 7. While this is above our full year 2025 performance, it remains substantially below the levels we experienced several years ago reflecting the meaningful progress we have made in strengthening our safety culture. We recognize that maintaining a strong safety performance requires constant attention and a commitment to continuous improvement. Safety must remain embedded in every aspect of how we operate, rather simply than a metric being reported each quarter. On behalf of our leadership team, I would like to thank all of our employees for their dedication to operating safely while delivering for our customers every day.

Their commitment is the foundation of everything we accomplish as a team.

Rory F. O'Donnell Jr.: With that, I will turn the call over to Rory to review our third quarter results, our outlook in greater detail. Thank you, Timothy, and good morning, everyone. I will begin with our third quarter operating and financial performance before discussing our liquidity position and financial outlook. Our third quarter results reflected continued execution against operating priorities, including disciplined production management, and ongoing cost improvements. While financial performance continued to reflect lower realized graphite electrode pricing associated with customer commitments established before our recent pricing action. Starting with our operations.

Production volume was approximately 27 thousand metric tons during the quarter, an increase of 2% compared to the prior year quarter, but a sequential decline of 19% from the second quarter of 26. The sequential decline in production primarily reflected planned summer maintenance shutdowns at our European manufacturing facilities. Capacity utilization rate for the quarter was 64%, compared to 63% in the third quarter of last year, and 74% in the second quarter of 26. Through the first 9 months of 26, production volume exceeded sales volume by approximately 2,000 metric tons. We continue to expect production and sales volumes to be balanced on a full year basis, consistent with our previous outlook. Turning to sales.

We delivered approximately 29 thousand metric tons during the quarter, essentially flat compared to the prior year period, and in line with our expectations. Importantly, year to date sales volume increased approximately 7% compared to the first 9 months of 2025. Keeping us on track to achieve our full year expectation for sales volume growth between 5% to 10%. Net sales for the quarter were $140 million, a decline of approximately 3% compared to the third quarter of last year, primarily reflecting lower weighted average realized graphite electrode pricing.

Our weighted average realized price was approximately $3.9 thousand per metric ton, down approximately 7% compared to the prior year quarter, and has been essentially flat through the first 3 quarters of 26. As Tim discussed, our reported pricing continues to reflect customer commitments established before the more recent improvements in market price. We expect the benefit of these higher price commitments to begin flowing through our reported results the fourth quarter. With a significant increase in realized pricings anticipated in 2027 compared to 2026. To put the financial opportunity into perspective, each $100 improvement in our weighted average realized price would equate to approximately $12 million of incremental annual cash flow, thereby further supporting our liquidity position.

Combined with these actions, are taking to optimize our manufacturing footprint and improve our cost structure, we believe this pricing momentum positions us to deliver stronger financial performance going forward. Turning to slide 9. We continue to make progress on our cost improvement initiatives, while managing the impact of ongoing inflationary pressures across several key input categories. During the third quarter, Cash costs of goods sold per metric ton declined approximately 4% compared to the prior year quarter. While this metric can fluctuate from quarter to quarter, due to production schedules, inventory timing, and the recognition of manufacturing costs, our underlying cost structure remains materially improved from the levels we experienced several years ago.

Our teams remain focused on identifying and executing to improve manufacturing productivity enhance operating discipline, optimize procurement effectiveness, and improve energy efficiency. To highlight 2 key areas of focus, first, with respect to decant oil, a key raw material in our needle cook operations, We continue to manage cost pressures through supplier diversification, and enhancements in our blending capabilities. In addition, sales of oil related byproducts from our needle coke manufacturing process provide a natural hedge that partially offsets increases in decan oil costs. Further, domestic feedstock sourcing and established supplier relationships provide an advantage in managing raw material availability. Particularly given the ongoing supply chain disruptions and uncertainty affecting producers in Asia.

Second, in Europe, fixed price energy contracts covering a significant portion of our 2026 requirements have helped insulate us from recent market volatility. We look to 2027, we anticipate higher energy costs as portions of that contractual coverage reset. And we are incorporating those expectations into our operating plans while continuing to pursue energy efficiency improvements. Despite these external headwinds, we continue to expect a low single digit percentage decline in cash cost of goods sold per metric ton for the full year of 2026 compared to 2025.

Looking beyond 2026, the planned consolidation of our manufacturing footprint through the closure of our highest cost facility, Monterrey, is expected to provide meaningful financial benefit As previously announced, we anticipate annual cash cost savings of approximately $20 million to $25 million with the full benefit expected in 2028. As well as a reduction in annual capital expenditure requirements of approximately $5 million beginning in 2027. We also expect a onetime release approximately $20 million to $25 million of working capital. With the majority anticipated to occur in 2028. These benefits will be partially offset by approximately $20 million to $25 million of onetime cash costs associated with the closure.

The majority of which is expected to be incurred by the end of 27. As we have emphasized previously, our objective is not simply to reduce costs in the near term, but to establish a more efficient and competitive manufacturing network that can deliver greater operating leverage as market conditions improve. Importantly, we remain committed to achieving these improvements while maintaining the product quality, reliability, and safety standards that our customers and employees expect. With that, let me turn to our third quarter earnings and cash flow performance. Turning to slide 10.

We reported a net loss of $47 million or $1.76 per share compared to a net loss of $28 million, $1.10 per share in the prior year Included in our third quarter results were approximately $14 million of restructuring and other exit charges associated with the planned closure of our Monterey manufacturing facility. The majority of which were noncash. Adjusted EBITDA was $9 million during the quarter, compared to $13 million in the prior year period. With the decline primarily reflecting lower weighted average realized graphite electrode pricing partially offset by lower cash cost of goods sold per metric ton. Turning to cash flow.

Net cash used in operating activities was $8 million during the third quarter while adjusted free cash flow was negative $16 million This represented a significant improvement from the second quarter when net cash used in operating activities was $69 million and adjusted free cash flow was negative $75 million Our third quarter cash flow reflected an increase in inventory levels that was consistent with our expectation. We continue to anticipate a reduction in working capital including inventory, during the fourth quarter. As we have discussed previously, our cash requirements are influenced by the seasonal nature of our working capital needs. As well as the timing of our semiannual interest payments on our second lien notes.

Which occurs in the second and fourth quarters. We continue to expect the second quarter to represent our highest quarterly cash requirement for 2026. With cash usage during the second half of the year significantly lower than during the first half. For the full year, we continue to expect a modest increase in working capital and we are maintaining our expectation for approximately $35 million of capital expenditures. Turning to the next slide. Let me review our liquidity position and debt maturity profile. We remain focused on preserving liquidity and managing our balance sheet prudently. As we execute on our strategic initiatives.

We ended the third quarter with approximately $242 million of total liquidity, consisting of $134 million of cash, and approximately $108 million of available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility. Importantly, we have substantially no debt maturities until December 2029. Providing us with the time to execute our operational and commercial initiatives and benefit from improving market conditions. Taken together, our liquidity position and debt maturity profile provide financial flexibility as we manage through the current industry environment and implement the actions necessary to strengthen our long term profitability. As we look ahead, we remain focused on preserving liquidity, managing capital expenditures, and working capital carefully, and pursuing opportunities to strengthen our balance sheet over time.

In my closing remarks, I would like to thank our employees around the world for their continued dedication and hard work. Their commitment is essential as we execute our strategic priorities and position GrafTech for improved financial performance. With that, I will turn the call back to Timothy for his closing remarks.

Timothy K. Flanagan: Thank you, Rory. Before we open the call for questions, I would like to close with a few thoughts on why we remain confident in GrafTech's future. First, we are making meaningful progress on the priorities within our control. Our commercial initiatives are gaining traction, We are securing customer commitments at significantly higher prices, and we are taking decisive actions to improve our manufacturing footprint and cost structure. While we recognize that our financial performance has not yet reflected the full benefit of these actions, we believe the progress we are making today is establishing a stronger foundation for improved profitability and cash flow. Second, we remain encouraged by the longer term fundamentals of our industry.

Continued transition toward electric arc furnace steelmaking, together with improving steel industry conditions outside of China supports our expectation for growth in graphite electrode demand over time. Third, GrafTech possesses a set of differentiated capabilities that we believe will be increasingly valuable as market conditions evolve. These include our global manufacturing network, substantial vertical integration into petroleum needle coke, advanced manufacturing technology, and our ability to provide high quality products and technical solutions to our customers around the world. We are also leveraging these capabilities to pursue opportunities in adjacent markets providing additional avenues for long term growth. Finally, we recognize the importance of strengthening our financial position.

We remain committed to disciplined capital allocation, preserving liquidity, and ultimately reducing leverage as our operating performance improves. We recognize that there is more work ahead, but we believe the combination of the pricing improvements we are securing, a more efficient cost structure, and our differentiated competitive position creates a compelling opportunity for GrafTech. Our focus remains on executing our strategy, delivering sustainable value for our shareholders. With that, we would be happy to take your questions.

Operator: We will now begin the question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star-1 to raise your hand. To withdraw your question, press star-1 again. We ask that you pick up your handset when asking a question to allow for optimum sound quality. If you are muted locally, please remember to unmute your device. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Bennett Moore with JPMorgan. Your line is open. Please go ahead. And just a reminder that if you are asking a question, to unmute your device. Thank you.

Timothy K. Flanagan: Yeah.

Operator: Maybe we go to the next 1.

Bennett Moore: Good morning. And then-- good morning. To you.

Timothy K. Flanagan: There you go. Hey, Bennett.

Bennett Moore: Can you guys hear me?

Timothy K. Flanagan: We can hear you now.

Bennett Moore: Okay. Sorry about that. Thanks for taking my questions. I guess it is. First, it is really encouraging to hear strong price momentum headed into 2027. So first, could you just talk about how the dialogue has been with customers on that front? And then second, is it your expectation that these increases will be margin accretive given the cost inflation, I guess, on the EU energy side and maybe lagged decan oil costs?

Timothy K. Flanagan: Yeah, absolutely. Thanks for the question. So maybe let's talk a little bit about kind of the evolution over the course of this year from a pricing perspective. You know, as we entered 2026 we saw declining spot prices that were contracting in the first quarter. Which led to the initial price increase that we announced at the end of the first quarter And we gave some guidance or at least some directional indications in the quarterly call that if you extrapolated what we are seeing in the marketplace as a result of that over the full volume, it would be roughly a 15% uplift.

And that is what is starting to take hold and will drive the mid single digit increase that we mentioned heading into the fourth quarter. And then early September, announced another price increase of 30%. And that really is where the negotiations start with every customer. And each customer is a bespoke or unique negotiation. But that is the starting point in you know, at this point right now, we are really pleased with, the progress we are making in those discussions. You know, we still have quite a bit of volume yet to book, but I think we are right on track where we have been in prior years at this point in time.

You know, now, you know, 4 to 6 weeks into the heart of, the negotiation season. You know, I would expect as we work through the end of the year, you know, we would end the year and get into the first quarterly call in February for the fourth quarter was roughly 60 to 65% of our order book confirmed. So, making good progress. You know, I think if I add some color to the customer conversations, I think they understand and appreciate that. Electrode pricing has been, on a downward slope for quite some time, and that, you know, necessarily is not sustainable, in the long run.

I think there is absolutely a recognition of the importance of the electrode industry to the health of the steel industry. And I think when you start to talk about utilization rates at 80% plus in The United States, there certainly is a need to, to have a stable supply base. So I think a lot of the conversation is oriented around that. But I think there is also a recognition too that to your quest-- to your second part of your question that there are rising costs, and there are some headwinds globally on the needle coke front, in particular, raw material input that we use, decan oil, as well as energy pricing.

I am confident in saying at this point in time that the price increase and the momentum we are building and where we land in next year will be margin accretive. We will more than offset any sort of price increases or. Sorry. Cost increases that we will experience, as I think, you know, we have done a pretty good job over the last couple of years and reducing our costs, and I think we can do quite a bit to combat the inflationary pressures we are seeing So, no.

Bennett Moore: that is great color. I appreciate it. My second question, I want to ask about the rationale behind why Monterey was specifically chosen. I think the location makes it appear as if it is counterintuitive, but presumably, there were some aspects related to efficiencies and prior investment at other facilities. So maybe if you could just help unpack that. Yeah.

Timothy K. Flanagan: No, it is a good question. So I think, you know, if you take a step back, you know, our first and foremost, and I think we would alluded to this in a number of calls previously, you know, with the market the oversupplied market conditions, you know, we felt that you know, we needed to evaluate what our portfolio looked like. Know, I think everyone on the call can appreciate that running industrial assets at 60% utilization is not a recipe for long term success. So really, our first objective was to bring that supply and demand oversupply back into balance to the extent that we could.

We looked at all of our facilities and really went through an evaluation process of saying, how do we continue to serve our customers? By serving our customers, maintaining the product mix that we have today, our capabilities around supersized electrodes to standard sizes, as well as some of the more unique products that we offer to the market that differentiate us. ALX, extra long lengths, the low oxidation items like that. Secondarily, we wanted obviously to improve our cost profile, which Rory spoke to in terms of bringing down our fixed costs.

We were able to reduce the overall cost profile, on a variable cost basis for a number of reasons, Monterrey is the highest cost facility that we had in our portfolio. Partially driven by the fact it is also the smallest set of assets in our portfolio. And then lastly, it is how we manage the risk of transition. right? And how we can ensure that we can do this seamlessly and not disrupt ultimately our customers' business. And I think 1 thing that is important you know, you raised the point of the proximity to The US market and that we only serve The US market, partially out of Monterey.

We have historically brought in quite a bit of material from our European facilities. So from our perspective, this is not really a change in the way we. We have otherwise had to operate. You know, St. Mary's gives us a lot of flexibility to you know, stockpile inventory, allow us to manage deliveries and shipments to customers, and so it is been a pretty efficient supply chain for us time.

Rory F. O'Donnell Jr.: So end of the day, we view it as it is the same needle coke going through the same production process under the same quality standards, with the same expectations of, product performance. So does not really affect how we think we will, deliver to our customers at the end of the day. Hey, Bennett. Just 1 more couple more things to add on the cost front. Do not overlook the efforts that we have made in the past few years around investment in equipment and process innovation around our needle coke production facility.

I think we have got a proven track record that we are able to battle changes in underlying crude indices and other commodity costs with our capabilities around blending. I mentioned it in my prepared remarks. With those with those investments we have been making, it is possible for us to continue to improve our premium needle coke quality with a diversified set of oils. We have got many refineries that supply us, not all the same quality. But we have got the science behind the blending and the ability to push in some of the blow of some of the volatile markets. So please keep that in mind. On the on the energy front, remember, we have an.

We have a pretty robust hedging strategy in Europe. Some hedging contracts are up to 2 years. So we. We are going to enjoy some against some of the volatility going into 2027 in some of our operations in Europe. But we are it is it is kudos to the team, the management team, around identifying these risks and properly mitigating whether it is through process innovation, supplier relations, equipment investment, or contractual commitments. So just wanna add that to Timothy's cost comments.

Bennett Moore: Oh, that is a great color and much appreciated. Maybe just sticking with that thread, if I can squeeze in 1 last 1 is with the Antora deal, I mean, there any opportunity here to help absorb stranded fixed cost at Saint Mary's?

Rory F. O'Donnell Jr.: Of course. that is 1 of the benefits that we see. We are not gonna guide to individual asset costs or any of the terms of the agreement. We are still working through it with our partner. But pleased where it is going. And that, of course, is what Timothy was mentioning around prudent use of our idle assets. that is exactly 1 of the objectives.

Bennett Moore: So I think I will leave it at that, but you can.

Rory F. O'Donnell Jr.: I am gonna assume what I said.

Bennett Moore: Yep. Alright. Thank you very much.

Timothy K. Flanagan: Thanks, Bennett.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Arun Viswanathan with RBC Capital Markets. Arun, your line is open. Please go ahead.

Arun Viswanathan: Great. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Yes, I think you mentioned kind of turning the corner on pricing initiatives. So maybe you can just elaborate on what you are seeing there. And maybe if you could link that to your outlook on needle coke as well. It sounds like you know, you have done some work there, but, yeah, is there is there more of a an outlook on what you see there, especially given the recent oil price inflation? Thanks.

Timothy K. Flanagan: Yes, Arun, thanks. On the price front, again, I think good progress is being made by the team across the board. You know, I think we will start to see the realization of the initial price increase that we announced back in March in Q4. And that will have a higher ASP reported out in the fourth quarter. And then you will see a step change that will be meaningfully higher as we head into 2027 as we continue to work through the negotiations. But very pleased with. Thus far with the team's effort and all the work that is been done throughout the year to get us here.

So yeah, I do not I do not know if there is much more I can say at this point on the price front. With respect to needle coke, you know, I think needle coke has been similar to electrode prices. Pretty stagnant for a number of years. And we probably entered the year somewhere in $1 thousand to $1.2 thousand range depending on grade. And we have seen that steadily increase over the course of the year. And really, that is a factor of 2 things. 1, obviously higher oil prices are gonna drive the byproducts for oil and that.

So that is certainly a driving up the price of needle coke to some extent, but also supply and demand. I think we are seeing greater demand in the market across a couple end markets and end users. Which certainly helps drive up the price of needle coke. So if I if I had to say where I think the market is today, we are probably in that $1.7 thousand to $2,000 a ton range. Again, which I think provides support, for higher, electric price going into 2027. And I probably would expect that number to continue to creep up as we head into Q1 and Q2 of next year.

And again, it is it is been a little while since we have had this conversation, but again, when you start to see needle prices in that range, Seadrift really becomes, a cost benefit to us and a and a strategic asset beyond the benefits we get from having surety of supply and the ability to control the quality of the product we put into our electrodes.

Arun Viswanathan: But we are really pleased with how that market's evolving as well. Thanks for that. And I guess wanted to get your thoughts on supply demand for electrodes globally Congrats on your own decisive actions here to close Monterrey. But would you. You know, you noted the percent utilization. I imagine the industry is also not running full, you know, maybe in the. Maybe above that 60%. But yeah, where do you think industry utilization rates are? And where do you think and do you expect other actions?

I know, you know, you yourself may not be able to take anything else, but I guess maybe just get your thoughts on that and then as a related question, you know, now that you have exited some extra-- or you will be exiting some electrode finishing capacity, conversion capacity, will you still be able to, potentially use some of your needle coke and divert it to the EV side, the battery materials market, or is that unlikely? Maybe you can offer your thoughts on both industry supply demand and then you know, potential forays into the EV industry. Thanks.

Timothy K. Flanagan: Thanks, Arun, and try to capture both of those. So just to clarify, on a year to date basis, we are at about 68% utilization. So a little better than the 60 that I threw out there before. But just as an example, I think if you look across the industry right now, if I had to you know, take an estimate of where I think you know, it is at collectively. We are probably sitting at about 65% globally outside of China.

If you take the 51 thousand tons of capacity reduction, that would put you probably closer to 70 or just over 70% So certainly a meaningful move in terms of balancing out supply and demand, but I think there is still opportunity for that, to tighten up and some of it will happen organically as electrode demand continues to grow. at, you know, call it, 3% a year over the next, you know, 5 years or so or as we project out. But, also, I think there is still opportunity for some supply reduction in the market You know, which plants and which competitors, you know, I think we have done our part.

I will not speculate as to what it is, but, I mean, I think at the end of the day, you know, this is a cost game and fixed cost leverage game in many respects. So I think the bigger the plant, the more cost competitive they tend to be. With respect to Seadrift and how we view Seadrift as an asset, certainly by reducing our electrode capacity that gives us a little bit more capacity or excess capacity out of Seadrift and certainly allows us to you know, continue to explore how we partner and supply needle coke into I will say broadly, other synthetic graphite applications, whether that is for EVs, energy storage, industrial defense applications, whatever.

So you know, we continue to work in the background as we have been saying for the last couple years, Antora is the first example of kind of all of this work by our development and technical teams, to come to market and allow us to use some stranded assets. We have a number of other initiatives and activities going on that will allow us to use the needle coke Seadrift, and pretty excited about where that will land longer term.

Arun Viswanathan: Thanks.

Timothy K. Flanagan: Thanks, Arun.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Abe Landa with Bank of America. Abe, your line is open. Please go ahead.

Abraham Landa: Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. Maybe just some housekeeping items. The cost to achieve the Monterrey closure, the $20 million to $25 million to $25 million, what is cash versus non-cash, and how do you split that up between COGS and SG&A?

Rory F. O'Donnell Jr.: That is that is a cash cost. $20 million to $25 million. So I would. I guess I would split it predominantly as cost of goods sold. The primary categories of that cost are general closure cost is about half and people cost is the other half. So you could probably think about that mostly as a. As COGS. But we will be isolating that to report it separately for you to go forward.

Abraham Landa: I-- sorry. Maybe the $20 million to $25 million cost saves. I guess, how-- how would you split the cost saves between COGS and actually Oh, I bet you-- I misread my question.

Rory F. O'Donnell Jr.: No. No. I think I think I misspoke. I misspoke over here. So That cost savings will be primarily cost of goods sold.

Abraham Landa: Okay.

Rory F. O'Donnell Jr.: We are lowering our overall Go ahead.

Abraham Landa: And there is no long-term liability, cleanup costs that are associated with closing the Monterey? So that is included in the first 20 as well.

Rory F. O'Donnell Jr.: that is included-- yeah. there is a lot of 20 to 25 millions floating around. So that first $20 million to $25 million was the cash cost expected from the closure. Which would incorporate all the site closure costs and other-- and their decision based costs And the $20 million to $25 million of cost savings going forward would be COGS savings.

Abraham Landa: Okay. Okay, that clarifies it. Yes, it does. You kind of mentioned that you thought realized prices would be up mid single digits. Quarter on quarter in the fourth quarter. I guess if we were to just to look at those open contracts, where you are able to actually enable cost increases or price increases What was the percent change on those volumes on a on a quarter?

Timothy K. Flanagan: For the first quarter. Basis or expected change. Yeah. So I will I will go back to kind of the analysis or the indicators that we shared previously. You know, because when the first price increase we announced was a range of $600 to $1.2 thousand so it was not ratable across each region. And again, negotiated on a customer by customer basis. But if you take what we achieved in those on a regional basis and apply our existing mix, it was about 15% you know, for the new contracts that we had. Again, just to remind you or the new commitments that we could made during 2026 after the price increase announcement.

But just to, again, to remind you that when we made the price increase announcement, about 80% of our volume was already committed. So it is a relatively small subset of customer commitments that were at that higher price point.

Abraham Landa: Okay. And that is essentially what you are saying is that is flowing through into the fourth quarter that is why we are getting to, like, the mid single digits. Yeah.

Timothy K. Flanagan: So if you think about if you think about the way. You know, so Q1 would have been all negotiated in 25. Q2 would have been almost entirely negotiated in 2025, maybe a some small volumes in 2026, but probably before the price increase. Q3 and Q4, that percentage of when it was contracted pre or post price increase tends to go up, the fourth quarter is going to have the biggest portion. And that is why we are seeing the price increase now trickle through our results.

Abraham Landa: And then given your recent price increase, I think it was 30%, In September ish time frame, that is going to then flow through Q1 combined with the commitments you typically get from the North American markets that will all essentially kind of flow through to the better, higher price increases and start in 2027. Am I kinda thinking about various parts correctly?

Timothy K. Flanagan: Yeah. So that will be a step change as we get into 2027. So all of the 2027 volume is being negotiated post this new price increase announcement. You will see a step change as we get into Q1 deliveries. And again, typically, it is it is more of that 60 to 65% that we have committed in, you know, the start of the new year is gonna be heavier weighted towards North American or US customers just the way those markets tend to contract.

Abraham Landa: Versus, the rest. But there is a lot of European and other region commitment in there as well. Maybe just touching on in the US, the anti-dumping and countervailing duties that were at least the preliminary was provided since your last call. It seems like especially in India, it was kinda lower versus your expectations. Maybe if those are reaffirmed, do you expect US graphite electrode import volumes to be impacted and maybe the impact on pricing?

Timothy K. Flanagan: Within The US? So a little disappointed in the outcome, but, again, I do not think the previously communicated numbers are our expectations. that is what the filed cases were and the preliminary assessment coming out of the ITC. But, again, I think as we made in our prepared remarks, you know, the investigation is not complete. You know, the information will be subject to verification as it always is as commerce works through its process. And, you know, I think we are confident that the Commerce will do an investigation, you know, before they announce their final ruling in Q1 of next year.

You know, in terms of market, you know, I think certainly, we saw, you know, the Indian competitors have you know, call it 10 to 15% of The US market. Few years ago. And with all of the turmoil and trade talk over the last year or year and a half, you know, I think that maybe has pulled back some. But I. You know, how that plays out going forward, I mean, prices are still going up absent the, announced increase or tariff, levels as high as what, the preliminary rulings would have otherwise suggested. So yeah, I think we like our position, both in The US and Europe globally. And our market position.

Again, I think it all comes down to value proposition, you know, for those customers, that value something other than just the absolute lowest price.

Abraham Landa: And then my last question, You said earlier that pet needle coke prices are being driven by graphite electrode demand, but then also other markets. Can you just describe what is going on? In those other markets and maybe kind of any other asset supply and demand perspective on pet needle coke?

Timothy K. Flanagan: Yeah. So, I mean, I think there is a few things. Right? Obviously, needle coke demand, I think all of the disruption in the oil markets to date you know, in terms of, you know, oil coming out of The Middle East and getting to needle coke producers globally, certainly will have an impact. As well as I think you. As you start to think about the demand and the impact that the diesel markets are having, As the refineries produce more diesel, they are producing less decan oil as decan oil means less needle coke in the market.

So all of those things can weigh on know, kind of the supply and demand balance, from a price pushing up, but also graphite electrode demand pulling needle coke prices up as well. So it. it is kind of a push and pull on that front.

Abraham Landa: Okay. Makes sense. that is all for me. Thank you.

Operator: Thanks. There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to Timothy K. Flanagan, CEO and president for closing remarks.

Timothy K. Flanagan: Thank you. And I would like to thank everyone on this call for joining us this morning. We look forward to speaking with you again next quarter. Have a great day.

Operator: This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. Parts of this article were created using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on The Motley Fool's insights and investing approach. It has been reviewed by our AI quality control systems. Since LLMs cannot (currently) own stocks, it has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer:This article represents the opinion of the author only. It does not represent the opinion of Webull, nor should it be viewed as an indication that Webull either agrees with or confirms the truthfulness or accuracy of the information. It should not be considered as investment advice from Webull or anyone else, nor should it be used as the basis of any investment decision.