Markel Group (NYSE:MKL) reported third-quarter financial results on Thursday. The transcript from the company’s third-quarter earnings call has been provided below.
This transcript is brought to you by Benzinga APIs. For real-time access to our entire catalog, please visit https://www.benzinga.com/apis/ for a consultation.
View the webcast at https://events.q4inc.com/attendee/576810349
Summary
Markel Group reported a 14% increase in adjusted operating income to $707 million for the third quarter, with a 15% rise in adjusted operating income per share due to ongoing share buybacks.
Insurance operations showed positive momentum with a 9% growth in ongoing underwriting premiums, and the combined ratio improved to 91.9%.
The company saw significant growth in its non-insurance businesses, with industrial adjusted operating income up 29% and financial up 30%.
Net investment income increased by 5% in the quarter, reaching $258 million, while ongoing share repurchases reduced the total share count by over 10% in the past five years.
Markel Group executed an adverse development cover agreement to provide $1.2 billion of protection, aiming to reduce uncertainty around legacy reserves and focus more on the specialty insurance business.
The company maintained strong capital discipline and continues to invest in core systems, data, and AI, while planning to maintain a focus on long-term growth and profitability.
Management changes included the retirement of Steve Markel and the appointment of Simon Wilson and Andrew Crowley as co-presidents.
Future outlook remains optimistic with plans to drive long-term earnings growth, supported by strategic investments and a disciplined approach to capital deployment.
Full Transcript
Thomas Gayner (Chief Executive Officer)
In the dual time horizons of forever and right now. For the forever, or long term, we look at the growth in five-year average operating income per share relative to our equity capital base. This five-year average operating income, along with total shareholder return, underpins our management team’s compensation. Over the last five years, the quarter ending September 30, 2026, we have compounded five-year average operating income per share at 16% a year.
For the right now, shorter-term periods like a quarter or a year, we look at adjusted operating income. Adjusted operating income excludes the market value movement in our equity portfolio and the amortization of acquired intangible assets. In the third quarter, adjusted operating income rose 14% to $707 million. Given our ongoing buyback program, adjusted operating income per share rose 15% in the quarter. We think there are four key takeaways from our business performance this quarter. First, we continue to see positive momentum in our insurance operations. Ongoing underwriting premiums grew 9%. The team continues to find ways to grow its book of business profitably in an increasingly challenging market. The combined ratio improved to 91.9%, even after absorbing 3 points from the Global Re runoff. Our three ongoing divisions released reserves again, $445 million year-to-date, against $397 million at this point last year.
Second, we also saw strength in our businesses outside insurance. Industrial adjusted operating income rose 29% on 10% organic revenue growth. Financial rose 30%, and consumer and other widened their margins. These businesses continued their long track record of generating cash, earning strong returns on capital, and providing Markel Group with direct, durable strength and resilience. Third, higher interest rates produce increased cash flow. Net investment income rose 5% in the quarter to $258 million, and 8% year-to-date to $770 million.
Fourth, we continued to repurchase Markel Group shares. We bought back $315 million of our shares in the quarter and $685 million year-to-date. We bought more than 1% of our shares in the third quarter and have now reduced our total share count by more than 10% over the last five years. We bought back these shares at what we believe are attractive discounts to intrinsic value per share. We believe each repurchased share will increase the compounding of Markel Group’s per-share value over the long term.
Before I hand things over, I’d like to take a moment to recognize and thank Steve Markel. Steve recently retired as Chairman after more than 50 years with Markel Group. Steve hired me more than 35 years ago when I was a young investor with a lot to learn. For me and many others he has served as a mentor. He embodies the Markel style. Steve’s analytical rigor and passion have been a cornerstone for Markel Group, and they will have a lasting impact.
Thank you, Steve. As Chair and CEO, I’m fortunate to work with Simon Wilson and Andrew Crowley, who have been named co-presidents of the holding company. Their expanded roles and involvement in the Markel Leadership Council, along with our lead independent director Mike O’Reilly, bring them closer to the center of how we lead and govern the company. At this point, Simon will provide a brief review of our insurance results as well as an update on the adverse development cover that we just announced.
Andrew will follow with comments on Industrial, Financial, and Consumer and Other. Brian will then cover highlights of our consolidated financial results before we open the line for your questions. As always, we appreciate your support as long-term shareholders of Markel Group, and we hope you share our enthusiasm for continuing to build the intrinsic value of each share of your company. Simon.
Simon Wilson (Chief Executive Officer)
Thank you, Tom, and good morning. We continue to make good progress simplifying and improving Markel Insurance. Excluding Global Re and the impact of the Hagerty transition, premiums grew 9% in the quarter. Our combined ratio was 91.9% despite 3 points of impact from our runoff Global Re division. Behind those numbers is disciplined underwriting. We are growing where we see attractive returns and pulling back where we don’t. In U.S. Wholesale and Specialty, premiums declined 3% as we deliberately reduced construction-related casualty and remained disciplined in a softer property market. The combined ratio is 89.0%. International premiums grew 45%, led by Marine, Structured Portfolio Solutions, and our regional businesses in Europe and Asia Pacific, with an 89.9% combined ratio for the quarter.
And in Programs and Solutions, the combined ratio improved to 87.0% from 94.2% a year ago. We are also continuing to see strength in our reserves. Our three ongoing divisions have released $445 million of reserves year-to-date, compared with $397 million at this point last year. At the same time, we are taking decisive action on legacy exposures. The agreement we’ve reached with Enstar provides $1.2 billion of adverse development protection above the covered reserves in Re and certain other exited lines. This is about creating greater certainty around the runoff and allowing us to focus even more squarely on the ongoing specialty insurance business.
The premium for the adverse development cover will be funded by management margin in the reserves and will have an immaterial impact on the underwriting results in the fourth quarter. This deal was done at the time of Markel Group’s choosing and makes strategic and economic sense for the business. Finally, we are managing our business tightly while investing for the future. Each of our three ongoing divisions has reduced expense ratio year-to-date, even as we continue to invest in our core systems, data, and AI. Our ambition is to build the preeminent specialty insurer in the world. Strong underwriting profitability, disciplined growth, improving efficiency, and decisive action on legacy exposures are all evidence of the progress we’re making.
There’s more to do, but I believe that Markel Insurance enters 2027 from a position of real strength. With that, I’ll hand it to Andrew.
Andrew Crowley (Co-President)
Thank you, Simon. It’s a privilege to share an update on our Industrial, Financial, and Consumer and Other businesses. In total, for the third quarter, revenue and adjusted operating income for these segments increased 10% and 35%, respectively. I will take the next few minutes to provide additional insight into each segment, including some context around the strength Tom previously mentioned. For our Industrial segment, last quarter we noted that decreasing profitability and increasing revenue was a trend we did not expect to continue. This quarter, results improved with revenue up 13% and adjusted operating income up 29%. The quarter-to-quarter change reflects both the natural variability of large-scale construction and capital equipment manufacturing and deliberate actions by our leaders to improve profitability. Quarterly growth was driven primarily by our precast concrete and fire and life safety businesses, which in recent years have invested in facilities, people, and selective acquisitions to meet rising demand.
Looking forward, backlogs remain strong, reflecting demand for high-quality solutions for the build-out of data centers and other critical commercial and industrial infrastructure. In the Financial segment, third-quarter revenue and adjusted operating income increased 13% and 30%, respectively. Higher revenue from our insurance-linked securities business was the primary driver of the increase, with additional strength from our lender services business. The increase in revenue and profitability from our insurance-linked securities business is another step forward in the multi-year effort by our team to develop innovative solutions for risk transfer at a price and structure that meet investor demand.
Short-term results from this effort can and will vary, but our commitment to innovating and stewarding capital will not. Lastly, in Consumer and Other, revenue and adjusted operating income increased 2% and 80% for the quarter, respectively. As a reminder, profitability in this segment is highest in the second quarter given ornamental plant sales are seasonal and peak in the spring. As a result, modest profit increases in other businesses during the first, third, and fourth quarters can have a large impact on the year-over-year percentage change.
In summary, our businesses across these segments are navigating complex market dynamics such as skilled labor shortages, geopolitical uncertainty, technological change, and inflationary pressures, all while delivering revenue and profit growth. Strong leaders empowered to respond to the challenges and opportunities they face are core to our long-term approach. Stepping back, as we highlighted during the reunion in May, we remain focused on long-term earnings growth outpacing capital growth across Markel Group.
The quality of our businesses and leaders is critical to achieving that result, as is our capital discipline. Over the past several years, we’ve deployed capital into our existing businesses, investing behind proven leaders in essential industries we know well. As we look ahead, we will maintain our relentless search to identify additional opportunities, both within our family and beyond, that meet our long-term criteria. With that, I’ll hand it to Brian.
Brian Costanzo (Chief Financial Officer)
Thank you, Andrew. As a reminder, our press release and 10-Q include full consolidated segment and divisional results. I’ll cover some financial highlights of our consolidated results before we open the call to answer your questions. Operating revenues, which exclude net investment gains, rose 6% in the quarter to 4.2 billion and 2% year to date to 11.7 billion. Operating income, which includes unrealized net investment gains and losses, was 383 million for the quarter compared with 1 billion a year ago. The difference is the equity market valuation changes. Unrealized net investment losses of 281 million this quarter versus unrealized gains of 433 million in the third quarter of 2025.
Adjusted operating income, which excludes net investment gains and losses and amortization of acquired intangible assets, rose 14% in the quarter to 707 million from 621 million a year ago. Year to date adjusted operating income was 1.6 billion compared with 1.7 billion for the first nine months of 2025. Net income to common shareholders for the third quarter was 259 million, or $18.15 per diluted share, compared with 751 million or $59.25 a year ago. Year to date, net income to common shareholders was 1.2 billion or $91.90 per diluted share, compared with 1.5 billion or $120.60 in the prior year’s comparable period.
Our equity portfolio stands at 13.1 billion at quarter end, including 9 billion of cumulative pre-tax unrealized gains. Higher interest rates lowered the market value of our bond portfolio, resulting in an other comprehensive loss of 416 million after tax in the quarter. Those bonds move back towards par as they mature and we are investing new insurance float and bond maturity proceeds at today’s higher yields. Net investment income for the year totaled 770 million, up 8% from a year ago.
Our holding company ended the quarter with 3.6 billion in invested assets. We funded 315 million in share repurchases in the quarter, bringing our year to date total to 685 million. Acquisitions totaled 9 million in the quarter, all bolt-ons within our existing businesses. Within public equities, we were net sellers of 75 million in the quarter. Finally, regarding the $205 million bad debt charge recognized in the second quarter at State National, we previously shared that we engaged an outside actuarial firm to help assess that exposure and the conclusions of that work were reflected in the charge we recognized, which was conservative and in line with our philosophy of establishing loss reserves that are more likely redundant than deficient. Consistent with this, we have not recognized any additional bad debt charges in the third quarter.
We also continued implementing proactive enhancements to State National’s processes, completing a comprehensive internal review of the potential impact of further deterioration of loss trends on the entire portfolio. We are confident in the health of our credit exposures. With that, we will turn it back to Kendra to open it up for your questions.
OPERATOR
We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question you may press star then one on your touchtone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then one again. At this time we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Your first question from the line of Andrew Kligerman with TD Cowen. Andrew, your line is open. Please go ahead.
Andrew Kligerman (Analyst at TD Cowen)
Thank you. Good morning, Markel Group team. My first question is around the adverse development cover. Wondering if you could share more detail. You know, the details that we were, you know, that I didn’t see in the Q and the release were, you know, how much of the investment portfolio, or reserves rather, will be transferred over, what will be the lost net investment income? And ultimately, Simon, I think you mentioned it would be EPS neutral in the fourth quarter, but looking out to next year what would ultimately be the EPS dilution or accretion.
So again, reserves transferred, net investment income, and EPS dilution or accretion all looking at 2027.
Brian Costanzo (Chief Financial Officer)
Yeah, thanks, Andrew. This is Brian. So the high level of the transaction, the total reserves subject to that are $4.8 billion. We transfer 2.25 billion of that to Enstar and keep the remaining portion on our books to run off as normal. And then for that we’ve got a $1.2 billion adverse development cover on top of that and we pay $120 million risk premium. So that’s kind of the general financial terms of the transaction in the press release. In terms of the net investment income, I think a good proxy for that is around a 4% yield pre-tax on that 2.25 billion that we transfer over to Enstar. It’s a little bit higher than the rate in the Q as these are the more in-the-tail reserves that we’re moving. We pay our piece of the reserves first and Enstar then picks up after that our retention is exhausted.
In terms of EPS for next year, we’re not going to give any guidance on that. What I would say is in the fourth quarter, consistent with what Simon said, we have the risk premium coming through. We have additional management margin that we would be releasing in the fourth quarter. We expect those two to be relatively neutral.
Andrew Kligerman (Analyst at TD Cowen)
Got it. Okay, that was really helpful. So we can do the math on what you provided there and, you know, then looking at the prior year development, you know, adding 5.2 percentage points benefit to the loss ratio. Could you share a little bit on the geography of that and what I mean is, you know, is it, you know, what proportion of short tail versus long tail? On the long tail side, could you share a little bit about the accident years that you were seeing and, you know, if possible, I mean it’s a lot but, you know, where is it coming—well, actually we have that in the Q, you know, whether it’s wholesale or programs or international.
So yeah, that’s the question.
Brian Costanzo (Chief Financial Officer)
Sure. And it’s Brian again. So what I would say is in the U.S., it’s a fair amount coming from first-party lines. So that’s your property and the marine personal lines, along with workers compensation. Obviously the property is going to be your more recent years with it being shorter tail. The workers comp is more spread out, including in some more of the back years. On your professional and casualty, more neutral I would say across those lines. A few pieces going up a little bit, a few pieces going down a little bit, but relatively stable in that space. And then the last place within the international division, releases within our marine and energy product and then some releases kind of across the portfolio across many of the other products. The one place where we did have some adverse trend is in the Global Re business, and that was specific to transaction liability due to some recent claims that have come our way the last kind of three to six months.
Andrew Kligerman (Analyst at TD Cowen)
Got it. And when you said professional and casualty were neutral, you know, accident years were pretty much neutral as well. Nothing—nothing jumping out.
Brian Costanzo (Chief Financial Officer)
Yeah, nothing in the back years. I mean we have our normal kind of roll-on, roll-off of margin that hits the more recent years, but pretty neutral.
Andrew Kligerman (Analyst at TD Cowen)
Thanks so much.
OPERATOR
Your next question from the line of Andrew Anderson with Jefferies. Andrew, your line is open. Please go ahead.
Andrew Anderson (Analyst at Jefferies)
Hey, good morning. With the combined ratio running in the low 90s year to date, how do you think about the durability of that level of profitability as certain markets soften, and where do you see the biggest offsets from some of the good underwriting actions and portfolio mix that have been helping recent results?
Simon Wilson (Chief Executive Officer)
Thanks, Andrew. It’s Simon. We’ve been working really hard to get that combined ratio down in the low 90s. You’ll know that from all of the different things we’ve done over the course of the last 18 months or so. I mean, in terms of what happens going into next year, we’re going to be working really, really hard to keep this consistency going. What I would say, I think the portfolio has improved significantly over the last two years. Just the announcement yesterday with the Global Re—that’s been a drag on results, you know, a period of time now—and that essentially, that noise goes away as we go into 27.
So I see that as a positive. The other areas where we’ve been working very hard on portfolio on the defensive side has been around U.S. casualty and, again, I’ve mentioned on several of these calls, but that construction casualty which we’ve really worked on over the last 18 months is something which I think will, over time, benefit the combined ratio. That said, there are headwinds, you know, whether it be in the property market generally across the world, particularly here in the U.S., whether that be in various London market lines, we are seeing softening and that’s going to have an impact on the overall economics.
But the good thing I think about our portfolio overall is we sell around about, I think it’s about 100 different products around the planet. And a lot of those where we’re really focusing on is the small to medium-sized risk, whether that be in the U.S. space or that good, growing European business that I mentioned in my opening comments. That’s the type of business which is less impacted by a sort of overall softening behavior across the marketplace.
And I think that’s, you know, when we get good at that, whether it’s with technology or with the way in which we’re going to market and the products that we’re selling there, that’s where I think we’ve got some degree of ballast across the portfolio overall. So I can’t say, you know, for certain, you know, what the results are going to be next year. But I think we’re just really strongly positioned from a portfolio perspective to continue this degree of consistency that we’ve generated over the last five or so quarters now.
Andrew Anderson (Analyst at Jefferies)
Thanks. And could you quantify the capital that you expect the ADC transaction to release and how should we think about the timing of that release versus allowing the reserves to run off naturally?
Brian Costanzo (Chief Financial Officer)
Yeah, Andrew, it’s Brian. I would say a rough estimate is a little under half a billion. One thing to remind there is we don’t think of that as capital coming out. The capital that we have in our insurance operations to support kind of what we need to support our business is really held in public equities. So really that’s an opportunity for us down the road to take that capital, redeploy it into growth opportunities within our existing three divisions.
Andrew Anderson (Analyst at Jefferies)
Okay, with that. I guess I’m just wondering, I mean, Markel Group, you guys have substantial financial flexibility and you’ve been funding buybacks from internally generated earnings. So how important was an accelerated capital release for the rationale for the transaction versus simply reducing uncertainty around these legacy and runoff reserves?
Thomas Gayner (Chief Executive Officer)
Yeah, it was to reduce the uncertainty and have a forward-looking way to run the business. The good news is we have good, robust capital positions and we have 360 degrees of opportunity. Whether it’s to invest in our existing business, make acquisitions, to buy publicly traded securities, or repurchase our own shares, we have the capital to execute what we want to do. This is about reducing uncertainty.
Andrew Anderson (Analyst at Jefferies)
Okay. And sorry, one more. You mentioned kind of investing into public equities. I would have thought at this valuation level that capital release would be going really through buyback. I imagine it’s all kind of the same pot, but should we think of some buyback from this capital release as well?
Thomas Gayner (Chief Executive Officer)
I think the good news is, I mean, money is fungible, so I don’t really check whether it’s from my left pocket or my right pocket. The good news, the pockets have money in them, and we have continued to repurchase shares and have expectations of continuing to do so. When I do the math, what of those 360 degrees we should be pointed at? Markel Group stock seems to be at the top of the list.
Andrew Anderson (Analyst at Jefferies)
Thank you.
OPERATOR
Your next question from the line of Tracy Benguigui with Wolfe Research. Tracy, your line is open. Please go ahead.
Tracy Benguigui (Analyst at Wolfe Research)
Thank you. And congrats on your ADC, to be sure. I’m assuming that this ADC excludes State National. And if that’s the case, did you feel like reserves are adequate there and you didn’t have to market an ADC for those liabilities, or did you try to extend the ADC to State National and you just didn’t get an appetite from your counterparty or other counterparties?
Brian Costanzo (Chief Financial Officer)
Yeah, Tracy, it’s Brian. The ADC does not include State National. We did not look to include State National in the transaction. This was about the legacy reserves and runoff portfolios that we have within our insurance business. As I mentioned, we did a lot of work at State National this period in kind of stressing out the reserves, increasing the loss trends above what we’re holding considerably and feel good about where that landed from being able to manage the collateral and capital position.
Tracy Benguigui (Analyst at Wolfe Research)
Okay. And also, year to date, your favorable prior-year development implies a steep ramp to meet your 2026 $800 million reserve release guide. Do you have a new guide, or do you get there mechanically since essentially $800 million is implied 5% of your 2025 reserves? So should we simply reduce the reserve base by the $4.8 billion ADC-subject reserves?
Brian Costanzo (Chief Financial Officer)
I think that’s the number, the range that we put in the K each year of what it could possibly be. I think that’s the top end of the range. You know, we consistently release reserves every quarter consistent with our reserving philosophy. I would expect the fourth quarter, nothing different to change there.
Tracy Benguigui (Analyst at Wolfe Research)
Okay. And just real quick on NII, appreciate the commentary, but is it fair to assume that a counterparty would not want equity, so you’d be giving up fixed income securities and you may need to rebalance your assets after the deal closes.
Brian Costanzo (Chief Financial Officer)
We did give up—we will be giving up—fixed income securities. That’s correct. We matched kind of the securities that we’re giving up kind of with the payout pattern. So I don’t expect any rebalancing to kind of manage our liquidity.
Tracy Benguigui (Analyst at Wolfe Research)
Thank you.
OPERATOR
Your next question from the line of Maxwell Fitcher with Truist Securities. Maxwell, your line is open. Please go ahead.
Maxwell Fitcher (Analyst at Truist Securities)
Thank you. I’m calling in for Mark Hughes. Just had a couple of questions on two specific lines of business. More broadly for general liability, so far through earnings on average, premiums are decelerating and some of your peers are highlighting a moderating price environment. I just wanted to get your observations there. How’s competition? Are you finding that pricing is still running ahead of loss costs?
Simon Wilson (Chief Executive Officer)
Yes, I specifically talk about the U.S. casualty or the U.S. general liability marketplace when we talk about that. It’s a very, very broad marketplace and with primary casualty and we have excess casualty, what we are finding are there are pockets which are very difficult and several competitors have mentioned this in their calls. I would put those out there as the trucking business, the habitational business, and the construction business. We do not and have not done a lot of trucking or habitational business in the past.
We did have a reasonable chunk of construction liability on our books, and so I feel more able to comment on that space. I think in that particular area we continue to see claims trending higher. People have used the number, you know, sort of in the double-digit numbers there. I wouldn’t disagree with that. And I think the amount of premium that people—and the rate that people are getting in that marketplace—doesn’t match the trend that we’re seeing. And that’s why we’ve actively reduced our exposure in that particular area. That said, and I think also in the excess casualty marketplace as well, I think that is a difficult part of the market to really get the rate above the trend at the moment.
So we’re trading cautiously in that area as well. There are areas of the primary market where I think we have specific expertise. We feel good about our ability to underwrite in that space and our ability to get the premium which is sufficient for the risk that we’re taking on board. So we’re kind of doubling down in those areas and making sure that our expertise and our capability are selling in those areas—and, for example, the environmental space. Healthcare is another area that we’ve done quite well in recently.
So we’re picking our spots and we’re also probably trending towards smaller and medium-sized business in that particular area. But the general commentary that it’s a difficult market I think is correct. But it’s also a very big market and I think there’s places where you can play successfully, and that’s what we’re doing at the moment and where we have confidence that we can make a good return over a long period of time.
Maxwell Fitcher (Analyst at Truist Securities)
Great, thank you for the color there. And then I guess switching gears to workers’ comp. One competitor highlighted increased claims frequency there, had to take up loss picks. Any thoughts on pricing? There is competition still rational? And are you observing any changes in the environment in workers’ comp?
Simon Wilson (Chief Executive Officer)
Again, workers’ comp is a big market over here. Different states have different behaviors. I think in general we’ve seen fairly flattish rate. It’s not a market that’s had huge swings in terms of pricing. I mentioned property earlier, which you have seen a very big kind of—like it steeply went up back in ’22–’23 and then has come back down again over the course of the last 12 to 18 months. Workers’ comp has been at a much slower trend and certainly in our particular part of the market—and we really do focus on the small end of workers’ comp and it’s generally monoline workers’ comp as well—we haven’t seen a significant drop-off in rate in that particular area. So we remain happy with the book of business that we have, which is a little different than some others that play in the medium to large space in the marketplace. But we haven’t seen any dramatic drop-off in that particular segment.
Maxwell Fitcher (Analyst at Truist Securities)
Great, thank you very much.
OPERATOR
If you have a question, please press star then one. Your next question from the line of Andrew Kligerman with TD Cowen. Andrew, your line is open. Please go ahead.
Andrew Kligerman (Analyst at TD Cowen)
Hello again. I was particularly interested in the industrial segment and the quick turnaround, and I think Andrew mentioned in the opening remarks that there could be some volatility. And then, as you kind of fleshed it out a little bit, it sounds like you’ve got some good exposure to data centers and industrial infrastructure. And then you mentioned a lot of backlog. So what changed in, you know, from quarter to quarter—it was kind of a steep turnaround—and then going forward it sounds very exciting.
And what we saw in the third quarter could be kind of a trend over the next few quarters or so. So maybe a little color on those two points.
Andrew Crowley (Co-President)
Andrew, this is Andrew. Appreciate the question and interest in our industrial businesses. You’re right. The change from the first half of the year to the third quarter was marked by significant profit increase year over year in the most recent results. When I step back, similar to what Simon said a minute ago, we operate across a variety of markets within that segment, whether it be bakery equipment, precast concrete, fire and life safety, you know, a whole host of others, equipment leasing. And so there’s a trend within each, and I highlighted around fire and life safety and precast concrete, which are integral in the build-out of both data centers and commercial and industrial infrastructure.
As to the results, you know, we’ve got a tremendous amount of talent at the leadership level. We feel great about that. They’ve taken actions to drive profit. You know, we do have slightly higher revenue growth which enables a little more operating leverage. So I think you combine those two things and that’s what you see in the third quarter. We’re excited about the businesses long term. Quarter to quarter, there will be some variability, but we’re glad to see that the results better reflect the feeling we have around the positioning of our businesses.
Andrew Kligerman (Analyst at TD Cowen)
That’s helpful. And then, you know, back to Simon, with regard to pricing on the property side of the equation, maybe you could share with us what your mix is in the insurance segment—meaning, you know, how much is short tail, how much is long tail—and with regard to the pricing, what are you seeing on the property side of the equation?
Andrew Crowley (Co-President)
Andrew, in terms of mix, it’s certainly in the U.S. slanted towards longer tail. So the property business, you know, is—you’ll call it 30%—of our wholesale and specialty division. The rest of that division is made up of kind of casualty, professional, and then our binding line which also includes some property in there. You want to talk about the rates environment, Simon?
Simon Wilson (Chief Executive Officer)
Yeah, I suppose on the property bit. So if you take that 30%, which is the actual kind of what we call property, and then you could probably take an extra 10% of the hundred from binding in there—there or thereabouts—so it’s kind of 40% of the book overall. I would suggest that property this year is probably off 25% to 30% in our book of business. It is competitive. It was interesting to see the storm season go through. We’re not done with the storm season yet—we remember Sandy from 2011, you know—so it’s not over till it’s over, but it’s trending in a way where it’s been very low catastrophe this year. So I would expect we go into a reinsurance renewal season with some very competitive terms being offered there, and that will lead to more competition as we go into next year. It’s been very, very significant in structured and layered large property placements, and the competition now I think is trending towards smaller and medium-sized property business as well.
So for sure, property does not have the margin that it did a few years ago. I don’t think we’re quite at the point where it’s underwater yet. I still think there’s profit to be made in that particular area, but we’re getting pretty close. So one would hope and expect as we go through the course of 2027 for that market to kind of flatten out a little bit and then discipline to come back through. But I do think there’s going to be some fairly major loss activity required in order to move that market substantively.
But I do think it’s beginning to flatten out because of the acceleration in the softening that we saw in the first half of the year—so it’s a little bit less. But the storm season this year, with the very few landfalls that we’ve seen in terms of hurricane activity, I can only imagine that we’re going to have softer reinsurance, which will lead to softer conditions in the primary market.
Andrew Kligerman (Analyst at TD Cowen)
Great color, Simon. And if I could just sneak one last one in just on Programs and Solutions, more specific in your businesses. What are the big pieces of Programs and Solutions? And the underlying combined ratio was about 99%. Did that concern you at all? And then what was in that huge 12 points of favorable release?
Andrew Crowley (Co-President)
I’ll start this off and I’m going to hand it over to Brian. So Programs and Solutions is made up of five business units. It’s Bermuda. It’s a programs division that does the delegated underwriting. It’s workers comp and small commercial, Markel personal lines, and surety. So there’s five businesses there that in total aggregate up to about just shy of $3 billion premium per year. You asked about the 99 combined ratio. Actually, the one driver of that we’re looking at is in that delegated programs business. We’ve got two programs in there which have caused us a bit of concern. I’ve mentioned the personal umbrella on previous calls. You know, that’s been something that we’ve been working hard at. We have taken very significant and deliberate action in that particular space. And I believe why the 99 isn’t a major concern for me at the moment—I’d like it to be lower, of course—is because of that action that’s been taken, and we expect that to improve over the course of 2027.
So it’s one of those deliberate underwriting discipline actions that we took. I think you mentioned the second part of the question. I’ll give to Brian.
Brian Costanzo (Chief Financial Officer)
Yeah. On the prior year releases, kind of two themes there. One, workers comp is in that unit—all of our workers comp—which has some steady releases. The other piece is our Bermuda property also had some significant releases in the quarter.
OPERATOR
This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Tom Gaynor for any closing remarks.
Thomas Gayner (Chief Executive Officer)
I want to thank you all for joining us today. We’ve been delighted to report on our progress of serving our customers and relentlessly compounding the intrinsic value of Markel Group over the long term. Thank you for your ongoing support and interest, and we look forward to keeping you updated as we continue to build and grow your company. Thank you very much.
OPERATOR
This conference call has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect.
Disclaimer: This transcript is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, there may be errors or omissions in this automated transcription. For official company statements and financial information, please refer to the company’s SEC filings and official press releases. Corporate participants’ and analysts’ statements reflect their views as of the date of this call and are subject to change without notice.