Summit Midstream (SMC) Revenue Rebound To US$138 Million Tests Bearish Profitability Narrative
Simply Wall St·03/17 23:27
Share
Listen to the news
Summit Midstream (SMC) has reported third quarter FY 2025 revenue of US$138.0 million with a basic EPS loss of US$0.13, as continued losses keep profitability in focus for investors. The company has seen revenue move from US$93.2 million in Q2 FY 2024 to US$138.0 million in Q3 FY 2025, while basic EPS over the same stretch has ranged from a loss of US$19.25 per share in Q3 FY 2024 to a loss of US$0.13 per share in the latest quarter, keeping margins firmly in the red and the quality of the earnings profile front and center for the market.
With the latest numbers on the table, the next step is to see how this margin picture lines up against the widely held narratives around Summit Midstream's business and its trajectory.
NYSE:SMC Earnings & Revenue History as at Mar 2026
Losses Narrow On Trailing 12 Months
On a trailing 12 month basis, net income loss sits at US$42.9 million on US$514.4 million of revenue, compared with earlier trailing periods where losses were as high as US$269.7 million on US$444.4 million of revenue.
Analysts' consensus view expects this negative earnings picture to flip to profit over time, with forecasts pointing to US$55.5 million of earnings and revenue of US$667.8 million by about December 2028. This contrasts with the current loss of US$42.9 million and highlights how much needs to change in the income statement for that scenario to play out.
Consensus narrative points to margin expansion from an 8.3% loss margin today to an 8.3% positive margin in three years, while the recent trailing data still shows loss making operations.
That same view assumes EPS moves from a trailing loss of US$3.65 per share to US$4.44 per share, a swing that is not yet visible in the historical figures provided.
Multi Year Earnings Pressure Versus Bullish Growth Story
Over the past five years, losses have increased at an average rate of 52.9% per year, and the trailing 12 month EPS of a US$3.65 loss per share lines up with this multi year deterioration even though recent single quarter losses are smaller.
Supporters of the bullish narrative highlight potential EBITDA visibility from items like the planned ramp up of the Double E Pipeline and expected cost savings from integration and compressor redeployment. However, the historical data still reflects rising losses and an earnings decline rate of 52.9% per year, which means the upbeat story on future volumes and margins is starting from a weak profitability base.
Forecasts count on fee based systems and stronger throughput to eventually lift net income, while the trailing 12 month loss of US$42.9 million confirms that these benefits have not yet flowed through to the bottom line.
Consensus also assumes analysts' revenue growth of 9.1% annually, which contrasts with the risk summary that flags continued declines in revenue and earnings over the historical period captured by the trailing data.
Bulls say the current loss run rate could set up a sharp earnings swing if volume and margin assumptions prove accurate, but the five year 52.9% annualized earnings decline shows just how much needs to change for that optimistic path to hold up in practice. 🐂 Summit Midstream Bull Case
Cheap Sales Multiple And Big DCF Gap
The stock trades on a P/S of 0.7x versus a 2.0x average for the US Oil & Gas industry and 1.1x for peers, and a DCF fair value of US$105.69 per share sits far above the current share price of US$30.73, a gap of roughly 70.9% to that model value.
Critics with a bearish tilt point out that this apparent discount sits alongside worsening profitability, so the low P/S and the gap to the DCF fair value do not automatically offset the five year 52.9% annualized earnings decline and the trailing 12 month loss of US$42.9 million. This could justify the market keeping the share price at a steep discount if earnings pressure persists.
The major risk flagged in the analysis is the multi year earnings slide, so the low 0.7x P/S may be reflecting concern about how durable revenues and margins will be rather than a simple mispricing.
At the same time, the difference between the US$30.73 share price and the US$47.00 analyst price target shows that even within the provided data, valuation views range from the current market level to both a higher target and an even higher DCF fair value.
Skeptics argue that the combination of a 0.7x P/S and a trailing loss of US$42.9 million may be a value trap, while others see room for upside if the business can move closer to the US$105.69 DCF fair value and the US$47.00 analyst target as profitability improves. 🐻 Summit Midstream Bear Case
Next Steps
To see how these results tie into long-term growth, risks, and valuation, check out the full range of community narratives for Summit Midstream on Simply Wall St. Add the company to your watchlist or portfolio so you'll be alerted when the story evolves.
After all this, the real question is how you feel about the balance of risk and reward. Move quickly, review the numbers yourself and weigh up the 1 key reward and 1 important warning sign.
See What Else Is Out There
Summit Midstream is still working through a multi year earnings decline, ongoing net losses and a weak profitability base despite revenue of US$514.4 million.
If that earnings pressure makes you cautious about concentration risk, broaden your watchlist with the 77 resilient stocks with low risk scores that focuses on companies with more resilient financial profiles.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Disclaimer:This article represents the opinion of the author only. It does not represent the opinion of Webull, nor should it be viewed as an indication that Webull either agrees with or confirms the truthfulness or accuracy of the information. It should not be considered as investment advice from Webull or anyone else, nor should it be used as the basis of any investment decision.