Torrid Holdings (CURV) closed out FY 2026 with Q4 revenue of US$236.2 million and a basic EPS loss of US$0.08, as net income excluding extra items came in at a loss of US$8.1 million. Over the past year, the company has seen quarterly revenue move between US$235.2 million and US$266.0 million, while EPS has swung from a profit of US$0.06 in Q1 to losses in Q3 and Q4, creating a mixed picture on profitability. For investors, the latest print keeps the focus firmly on how Torrid manages costs and margins from here, with compressed profitability remaining a key issue to watch.
With the headline numbers on the table, the next step is to see how these results line up with the dominant market narratives around Torrid, and where the new data challenges those stories.
NYSE:CURV Earnings & Revenue History as at Mar 2026
Same Store Sales Under Pressure
Same store sales were down 4% in Q1 FY 2026, 7% in Q2, and 8% in Q3, alongside quarterly revenue moving from US$265.9 million in Q1 to US$235.2 million in Q3 and US$236.2 million in Q4.
Bears argue that weaker store traffic and higher promotional activity will keep pressure on margins and earnings, and the pattern of declining same store sales through FY 2026, together with losses of US$6.4 million in Q3 and US$8.1 million in Q4, fits that concern.
The trailing twelve month shift from net income of US$16.3 million in Q4 FY 2025 to a loss of US$7.0 million by Q4 FY 2026 aligns with the cautious view that weaker demand can weigh on profitability even when total revenue stays around US$1.0 billion.
At the same time, bears expect revenue to decline by 3.2% per year while margins improve, and the current run rate of around US$1.0 billion in trailing revenue provides the base they are using for those more conservative assumptions.
Bears who focus on store traffic and promotion risk point to these trends as reasons to stay cautious on how quickly Torrid can rebuild profitability over the next few years 🐻 Torrid Holdings Bear Case.
Trailing Twelve Months Slip Back Into Loss
On a trailing twelve month basis, Torrid moved from net income of US$16.3 million and EPS of US$0.16 at Q4 FY 2025 to a net loss of US$7.0 million and EPS of US$0.07 loss by Q4 FY 2026, even though trailing revenue stayed close to US$1.0 billion.
Consensus narrative talks about cost actions and digital growth helping margins, but the swing from a trailing profit of US$10.1 million at Q1 FY 2026 to a trailing loss by Q4 shows that recent cost pressures and weaker comps have so far lined up more closely with the cautious parts of that view than with the expected margin improvement.
The fact that trailing revenue eased from US$1.09 billion at Q1 FY 2026 to US$1.00 billion at Q4, while EPS went from US$0.10 to a loss, ties directly to the concern that promotions, tariffs and other external costs can offset the benefits of store closures and digital mix.
Analysts expecting revenue to decline by 2.6% per year but earnings to reach US$23.7 million by 2028 are effectively assuming a clear margin rebuild from this weaker trailing starting point, which readers may want to test against the recent shift back into losses.
Valuation Gap Versus DCF Fair Value
With the share price at US$1.60 and a DCF fair value of about US$2.67, the stock is trading roughly 40% below that DCF estimate, while the P/S of 0.2x sits below the US Specialty Retail average of 0.4x and in line with peers at 0.2x.
Bulls argue that sub brands, fit technology and omnichannel investments can support a long term earnings recovery, and the combination of a DCF fair value above the current price and earnings forecasts moving from a loss of US$7.0 million on a trailing basis to a projected profit path is what heavily supports that optimistic stance.
Supporters also point to forecasts that earnings could grow very quickly from current loss levels, which, if achieved, would make a P/S of 0.2x and the discount to DCF fair value look appealing compared with an industry that trades at a higher P/S.
Against that, balance sheet risks such as negative shareholders’ equity and weak interest coverage in the risk summary show why some investors may treat the discount to DCF fair value more cautiously than bulls suggest.
If you want to see how optimistic investors join these earnings trends with the growth story around new sub brands and digital, take a closer look at the 🐂 Torrid Holdings Bull Case
Next Steps
To see how these results tie into long-term growth, risks, and valuation, check out the full range of community narratives for Torrid Holdings on Simply Wall St. Add the company to your watchlist or portfolio so you'll be alerted when the story evolves.
With bulls and bears clearly split on Torrid’s story, this is a good moment to look through the numbers yourself and decide what they really say. To weigh up both the concerns and the potential upside in one place, start by reviewing the 2 key rewards and 2 important warning signs
See What Else Is Out There
Torrid’s shift from trailing profit to loss, weaker same store sales, and margin pressure all highlight how fragile earnings can be when demand and costs work against each other.
If that mix of losses and balance sheet concerns feels uncomfortable, you might want to quickly compare it with companies in the 70 resilient stocks with low risk scores.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Disclaimer:This article represents the opinion of the author only. It does not represent the opinion of Webull, nor should it be viewed as an indication that Webull either agrees with or confirms the truthfulness or accuracy of the information. It should not be considered as investment advice from Webull or anyone else, nor should it be used as the basis of any investment decision.